Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission
Major Transportation Investment Study (MTIS)
Executive Summary

(prepared by Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas)

The Watsonville Junction to Downtown Santa Cruz to UCSC Campus Major Transportation Investment Strategy (MTIS) technical efforts have been completed. This report summarizes the results from this MTIS, evaluates the alternative investment strategies, and concludes with the consultant team’s recommendations in terms of the recommended investment strategy to be pursued by the SCCRTC.

The recommended investment strategy is to pursue additional funding through a new ¼-cent sales tax and a federal earmark to construct by the year 2006 a busway and bikeway project in the Santa Cruz Branch Line right-of-way between Natural Bridges and State Park Drive. As part of this concept and in the near-term, it is also recommended that an Intercity Recreational Rail service on weekends be instituted and test marketed for the longer term.

With these recommendations implemented, the consultant team believes that the transportation challenges facing the region are being addressed to a degree; without them it is clear that travel in the region will deteriorate over time as the region grows.

Summary of MTIS Results

A summary of each technical task is presented below:

Task 4, Public Participation, remains on-going and will consist of several efforts during the Fall of 1998. Efforts conducted to date include:

To date, it is clear from the public input and interest in the MTIS that a broad-based consensus does not presently exist to implement one study alternative over another. There continues to be, for example, strong advocates for widening Highway 1 for carpool lanes and strong advocates for implementing rail service in the corridor. There are also a bus oriented and "do nothing" contingents in the community. Further public input, review and comments will be gathered during the upcoming public input phase in the Fall of 1998.

Task 5, Model Development, established the methodology for the travel forecast model and identified several areas of further model development that would enhance the capability of the travel demand model to forecast the unique travel patterns in Santa Cruz County. These changes could potentially results in travel patterns different from those presented in the MTIS. The three areas of recommended further study are:

Task 6, Screening of Alternatives, led to the identification of eight alternative investment strategies based on a two-phase screening process. First, 34 alternative concepts were initially identified leading to the screening of 15 alternatives. The 15 alternative concepts were then reviewed with the public and decision-makers and subsequently refined into eight "investment strategies" for detailed study. The eight investment strategies were studied in detail in this MTIS. Also, it should be noted that, as stated in Section 3.1 of this document, there were certain key design or implementation decisions made that influenced the costs of the alternatives studied.

Task 8, Detailed Definition of Alternatives, provided a set of engineering drawings and cross-sections, as well as graphic and written descriptions of the alternatives. The information presented in this task was used to develop the cost estimates and served as the basis for developing the travel forecasts.

Task 9, Travel Forecasts, resulted in a series of traffic and transit travel forecasts that were reviewed by and accepted by a "Peer Review" of travel forecasting experts. In addition to this, the reader is reminded of the following anticipated future conditions based on the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) forecasts:

Task 10, Transportation Impacts, presented the results of the travel forecasting process. The key results presented in this task were:

Task 11, Environmental Scan, resulted in an analysis of environmental issues in the corridor and provided recommendations for the next phase of environmental review. The key conclusion from the scan was that none of the investment strategies appear to have a fatal flaw in terms of environmental effects that would preclude their development. Mitigation measures will be required, however, to implement one or more of the alternatives.

Task 12, Capital and Operating & Maintenance Costs identified the associated costs for each of the alternatives. It is noted that given the level of engineering detail available to the consultant team during this phase of study, there are relatively large contingency factors used to produce the cost estimates. The cost estimates have been reviewed and approved by the independent Peer Review team.

Task 13, Financial Analysis, provides an analysis of the financial condition and financial capability of the region to continue the status quo and/or construct and operate & maintain the various alternatives tested. The key results of this task were:

Task 14, MTIS Report, is this report and provides a summary of the findings and the consultant's recommended investment strategy.

Task 15, Intercity Recreational Rail Study, was completed in August, 1996 and provides an assessment of the operational infrastructure considerations for running a weekend recreational rail service between the San Francisco Bay Area and the Santa Cruz community. The assessment identified possible operators, ridership potential, infrastructure improvements, a potential operating plan, and the institutional and financial issues associated with the provision of an intercity recreational rail service. The study concluded with a recommendation for a near-term operating strategy and operating plan. Also presented was a matrix of potential future improvements and operating effects for medium and long-term service concepts.

Recommended Investment Strategy

In light of the Commission's recent decision not to endorse any recommended investment strategy at this time, this portion of the executive summary is not included here.

The adopted program of projects for the Watsonville - Santa Cruz - UCSC corridor is available. You can read it on-line, e-mail your request or call 460-3200 to receive a copy.


If you have questions, comments or would like additional information on any of the Commission's activities, programs or projects, please contact staff.

If you have comments or suggestions about the website, please contact the websmith.

Home Transit Commute Highway Bicycle Commission Links